APHC010786002016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4379/2016 Between: 1. Y. VIJAYA KUMARI, W/O LATE YESUDAS, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OFFICE SUBORDINATE, RETIRED ON MEDICAL INVALIDATION 0/O DIVISIONAL ENGINEER/TL & SS, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP TRANSCO, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not reinstating the petitioner as Office Subordinate under Medical Invalidation grounds as the petitioner has five more years left in her service as on the date of her retirement on medical invalidation dt.22-09-2011 as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.25-09-2015 made to the 2nd respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 5608 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.25- 09-2015 made to the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D L PANDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 2. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO) 3. N SIVA REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri A.Ravindra Babu, learned counsel representing Sri D.L.Pandu, learned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that in view of subsequent facts and circumstances involved in the lis, he seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to work out his legal remedies in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24th September, 2025 RKS