SUMAN BAI DAUGHTER OF SHRI SURAJBHAN WIFE OF DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16797/2025 · 2025-11-03
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38907 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38907 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44287] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16797/2025
1. Suman Bai Daughter Of Shri Surajbhan Wife Of Devendra Kumar Yadav, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Karnikot, District Alwar, (Raj.).
2. Kanta Bai Daughter Of Shri Patram Yadav Wife Of Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Jaitpur, Tehsil Behror District Alwar, At Present District Kotputali Behror (Raj.).
3. Yesvant Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Ramji Lal Verma, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Saypur Karauli, District Karauli, (Raj.).
4. Shyam Sunder Sharma Son Of Shri Murari Lal, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Dundipura, Tehsil Sapotra, District Karauli, (Raj.).
5. Virendra Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Thana Ram Yadav, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Village Dilawarpur, Tehsil Shahpur, District Alwar, (Raj.).
6. Vimala Kumari Daughter Of Shri Mool Chand Wife Of Vinod Kumar Kalal, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Mahadev Colony, Kushal Magri, Dungarpur, (Raj.).
7. Murari Lal Sain Son Of Shri Vishambar Dayal Sain, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of 240, Vpo Mundanwara Kalan, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar, (Raj.).
8. Daksh Pandya Son Of Shri Yashvant Kumar, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 6, Mukam Post Vedawada, Post Kanba, Kanwa, Dungarpur (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medial And Health And Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Directorate, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Additional Director, (Administration), Medical And Health Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical,
[2025:RJ-JP:44287] (2 of 4) [CW-16797/2025] Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. The Additional Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. The Project Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Sikar (Raj.)
8. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Alwar (Raj.)
9. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kotputali Behror (Raj.)
10. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Karauli (Raj.)
11. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dungarpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 03/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:
“It is, therefore, requested that Your Lordship would be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction quash and set aside the action of the respondents in reducing the number of posts of Nurse Grade-11 (GNM) from 6172 to 3704, being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and Direct the respondents to consider and fill up all 6172 posts of Nurse Grade-II (GNM) as advertised 06.08.2007, including the remaining 2500 posts which were arbitrarily reduced; and Direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the
[2025:RJ-JP:44287] (3 of 4) [CW-16797/2025] petitioners, who are duly qualified and had participated in counselling, for appointment against the posts of Nurse Grade-II (GNM), strictly in accordance with law or may kindly be pleased to decide the writ petition in the light of case of D.B. Special Appeal No. 414/2019, titled as State of Raj, and ors. (Writ) Versus Suresh Kumar and Ors. decided on 15.09.2025 by Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court Jaodhpur in the larger interest of justice. ii. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. iii. Cost of writ petition also may kindly be awarded in favour of petitioners.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 Suresh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein has already been settled by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar and Ors. on 15.09.2025. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with
judgment dated 19.12.2018 and affirmed on 15.09.2025.
3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of judgment dated
[2025:RJ-JP:44287] (4 of 4) [CW-16797/2025] 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 and partly modified on 15.09.2025 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of judgment referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
6. With the above directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/491