- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41624-DB RP No. 221 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REVIEW PETITION NO. 221 OF 2023 IN W.P.No.15419/2021 (L-TER) BETWEEN: STATE BANK OF INDIA PRESENTLY LOCATED AT LOCAL HEAD OFFICE NO.65, ST. MARK'S ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ASST. GENERAL MANGER (HR) MR.ANAND V GANGUR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.P. MUTHANNA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. VIJAYABHASKAR SHETTY SINCE DECEASED, REP. BY LRS 1(a) SMT VRANDA V SHETTY 1(b) SRI RAHUL V SHETTY 1(c) SRI GOKUL V SHETTY ALL ARE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO A-1 CASA LAVELLE - 6 Digitally signed by KORLAHALLI BHARATHIDEVIKRISHNACHARYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41624-DB RP No. 221 of 2023 LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.SHAKER SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 (A TO C) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC READ WITH RULE 39 OF WRIT PROCEEDING RULES, HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS LEADING TO PASSING OF THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 15419/2021 (L-TER) PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT AND ON PERUSAL OF THE SAME, BE PLEASED TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2023 AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the proposed respondents, who appears online. 2. This review petition has been filed seeking to review the order dated 21.03.2023, passed by a - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41624-DB RP No. 221 of 2023 Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.15419/2021 (L- TER). 3. The contention of learned counsel for the review petitioner is that, since no application was filed for condonation of delay, as well as to set aside the abatement, time had been sought from the Court to bring those applications on record in support of IA.No.1/2022. IA.No.1/2022 was filed for bringing the legal representation of deceased respondent on record. 4. A perusal of the impugned order under review reflects that the writ petition was dismissed on the ground that the respondent had died and legal representatives of the deceased respondent were not brought on record. No applications for condonation of delay, as well as to set aside the abatement, were filed. The writ petition was therefore dismissed. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41624-DB RP No. 221 of 2023 We find no error apparent on the face of the record that would make review of the order impugned. This Review Petition is therefore dismissed. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4