IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 17594/2025 Decided on: 14.11.2025 Virender P. Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and accepts, notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is seeking applicability of Lalit Sen versus State of H.P and others.2 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No.10783 of 2024, decided on 07.10.2025. 2 representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 14th November, 2025(yogesh)