Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38902 (CHH)

CHANDIKESHWAR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7996/2023 · 2025-08-31

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:44468 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7996 of 2023 1 - Chandikeshwar Singh S/o. Late Ramnarayan Singh, Aged About 52 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Panchayat Secretary Village - Panchayat - Bhanoura, Janpad Panchayat - Balrampur District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan Atalnagar Nava Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat - Balrampur, District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat - Balrampur, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/09/2025 1. This petition is preferred against orders dated 21.09.2023. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 21.9.2023 (ANNEXURE P-1) issued by the respondent no.2 in respect of petitioner. 10.2 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Vide order dated 06.10.2023, the petitioner was granted stay by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said orders, has lost its efficacy and as such the order(s) dated 21.09.2023 is required to be quashed and accordingly the said order under challenge is hereby quashed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena