APHC010782792018 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI IN FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO rpiMiMAl revision case No.2822 of 2018 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, Aggrieved by the C.C.No.92 of 2016, dated 13-07-2018 on of First Class, Darsi, Prakasam District. Revision filed under Sections orders in Crl.M.P.No.922 of 2018 in the file of the Judicial Magistrate . Between: Peraiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ; Ballikurava Mandal, Srinivasa Murthy, S/o Native 1. Yannam Employee, Prakasam District. of Ambadipudi Village 2 Yannam Sandhya Rani. W/o Srinivasa Murthy, Aged about 35 years, Ambadipudi Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Occ; Housewife, Native of Prakasam District. ...Petitioners/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 3 AND Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court The State of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances of the petition, the High Court may be Petition under stated in the affidavit filed in support pleased to grant stay of all further [proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.92 of 2016, dated 13-07-2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Darsi pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. : Sri P Nagendra Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order: Counsel for the Petitioners £ APHC010782792018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2822/2018 Between: 1.YANNAM SRINIVASA MURTHY, S/0 PERAIAH AGED ABOUT 40YRS, OCC. EMPLOYEE NATIVE OF AMBADIPUDI VILLAGE BALLIKURAVA MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2.YANNAM SANDHYA RANI, W/0 SRINIVASA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 35YRS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE NATIVE OF AMBADIPUDI VILLAGE BALLIKURAVA MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the orders in CrI.MP No. 922 of 2018 in C.C.No.92 of 2016, dt. 13-07-2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Darsi the present Criminal Revision is filed on the following among other lANO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.92 of 2016, dt. 13-07-2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Ciass, Darsi pending disposal of the CrI.R.C. in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 2 1.P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case was settled before the Lok Adalat. 2. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Darsi, Prakasam District. The Station House Officer, Thallur Police Station, Prakasam District. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi[OUT] One CC to Sri P Nagendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. TK vna A HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER ANDH^ CRLRC No.2822of 2018 O 2 ii SEP 2025 % . Current section DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS