Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38892 (AP)

E R LAKSHMI, KRISHNA DIST v. V ARUN TEJA, E.GODAVARI DIST & 1 OTHER

CRP/3076/2016 · 2025-07-22

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010784932016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI r- BS- WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3076 OF 2016 Petition under Section 22 of A.P. Buildings (Lease Rent and Eviction) Control Act set aside the order and decree dated 26-04-2016 in C.M.A.No. 3 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal-cum-Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. Between: Edibilli Rama Lakshmi, W/o. Late Apparao Aged about 48 years, Occ; House wife R/o D.No. 7/486, Goldugupet Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ...Petitioner/{Appellant/Respondent) AND 1. Vanapamula Arun Teja S/o. Panduranga Vithal Gopal Aged about 41 years, Occ: Employee R/o Kakinada, East Godavari District. ...Respondent/Respondent 2. Vanapamula Panduranga Vithal Gopal, S/o. Sundara Ramaiah, aged about 76 years, R/o D.No. 7/486, Azad Road, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ...Respondent/(Respondent/Respondent) ✓ lA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 3929 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to the Decree and Order dated 10-10-2012 passed in R.C.C.No. 9 of 2009 on the file of the Rent Controller -cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District as confirmed in Order and Decree dated 26-04-2016 in C.M.A.No. 3 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal -cum- Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI V.V. PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.2: — The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010784932016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3076/2016 Between: 1.E R LAKSHMI, KRISHNA DIST, W/0 LATE APPARAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE R/0 D.NO. 7/486, GOLDUGUPET MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.V ARUN TEJA E GODAVARI DIST 1 OTHER, S/0 PANDURANGA VITHAL GOPAL AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE R/O KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2.VANAPAMULA PANDURANGA VITHAL GOPAL, S/0 SUNDARA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 7/486, AZAD ROAD, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order and decree dated 26-04-2016 in C.M.A.No. 3 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal-cum-P rincipal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District by allowing the revision in the interest of justice and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 3929 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to the Decree and Order dated 10- Pi 2 10-2012 passed in R.C.C.No. 9 of 2009 on the file of the Rent Controller - cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District as confirmed in Order and Decree dated 26-04-2016 in C.M.A.No. 3 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal -cum- Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, pending disposal of the Revision in the interest of justice or to pass Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VV PRABHAKARA RAO 3 The Court made the following Order: Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for 2. non prosecution. No costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- U SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Rent Control Appellate Tribunal-cum-Principal Senior Civil Judge Machilipatnam, Krishna District, (with records if any) One CC to Sri. Thadikonda Koteshwara Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Two CD Copies 2. 4. 6. Chp srep f HIGH COURT DATED:23/07/2025 ANDT^ Cj ■* ORDER g 0 6 AUG m Si, ^ Current Section CRP NO. 3076 OF 2016 DISMISSING THE CRP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS