IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.771 of 2025 ------ 1. Vinesh Pal @ Binesh Pal, aged about 45 years, son of Nifikir Pal, resident of Village Baitari, P.O. Amrora, P.S. Kharoundhi, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) 2. Bachia Devi @ Bachiya Devi, aged about 44 years, wife of Vinesh Pal @ Binesh Pal, resident of Village Baitari, P.O. Amrora, P.S. Kharoundhi, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) 3. Shila Kumari @ Shila, aged about 21 years, daughter of Devki Manjhi, resident of Village Bijaka, P.O. Ramkanda, P.S. Bhandaria, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) 4. Satyendra Pal @ Satendra Pal, aged about 25 years, son of Vinesh Pal @ Binesh Pal, resident of Village Baitari, P.O. Amrora, P.S. Kharoundhi, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-05-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Kharaundhi P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 instituted under Sections 115(2)/123/109/351(2)/351(3)/ 85/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 4/6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 2004, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being the father-in- law, mother-in-law, husband and relatives of the other petitioners treated the informant with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry and attempted to murder her. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that because of marital discord, this false case has been foisted against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioner No.4 undertakes that he will keep and maintain the informant with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife if and when she resumes conjugal life with him. It is lastly submitted that petitioners undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from the date of the order and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Nagar Untari in connection with Kharaundhi P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and the petitioner No.4 will keep and maintain the informant with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife if and when she resumes conjugal life with him and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/