Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010196182025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3982/2025 MD ABDUL BARI S/O LT FOIJAL HOQUE VILL KATLAMARI PS LAKHIPUR DIST GOALPARA ASSAM PIN 783330 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVOPMENT DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER GOALPARA PO GOALPARA PIN 783101 DIST GOALPARA ASSAM 3:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER JALESWAR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK LAKHIPUR PO AND PS LAKHIPUR DIST GOALPARA ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER JALESWAR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK LAKHIPUR PO AND PS LAKHIPUR DIST GOALPARA ASSAM 5:THE SECRETARY KHALICHABHITA GAON PANCHAYAT PO KHALICHABHITA PIN 783330 DIST GOALPARA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. T R SARMA Advocate for : SC P AND R.D. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER
02.09.
2026 Heard Mr. T.R. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel for the P and R.D. Department.
2. It is the common submission of the learned counsel that the writ petition has become infructuous by lapse of time, and since a fresh tender has been floated.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
4. The petitioner would be at liberty to exercise their legal rights, if any remain, by filing appropriate applications. JUDGE Comparing Assistant