APHC010024842011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO:340 of 2011 Between: Korlakunta Venkateswara Rao ...APPELLANT AND Mukkapati Upendra Babu ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. W V S RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P PRABHAKAR RAO 2. The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: On 07.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Thereafter, the matter was posted to 21.08.2025 and directed both the learned counsels to get ready on the next date of adjournment. 2. On 21.08.2025, though there was a direction to both the learned counsels, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 28.08.2025. 3. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not showing any interest to prosecute the appeal. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 5. In view of the above circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 28.08.2025 KNN