CWP-10633-200 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 965 Dr. Urwinder Singh State of Punjab and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : None Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition 30.12.2005 and 01.06.2006 and recovery ordered the petition had stayed. 2. In the index of the petition, reference CWP-1724-2006 and the statement of learned counsel for the parties of it being covered by decision dated 01.07.2009 in CWP vs. State of Punjab of Punjab, was withdrawn on 11.01.2012. 3. In the case at hand, there is nothing in the written statement that the petitioner received the amount by making any misrepresentation or concealment of facts, however, learned State counsel 2006 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Dr. Urwinder Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** None for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition 30.12.2005 and 01.06.2006 vide which the increments granted were withdrawn and recovery ordered, which the Division Bench on 17.07.2006 while admitting the petition had stayed. In the index of the petition, reference 2006 and CWP-10964-2005 which was disposed of the statement of learned counsel for the parties of it being covered by decision dated 01.07.2009 in CWP-17156-2008 titled as vs. State of Punjab and others, against which LPA was withdrawn on 11.01.2012. In the case at hand, there is nothing in the written statement that the petitioner received the amount by making any misrepresentation or concealment of facts, however, learned State counsel, despite best efforts - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10633-2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY . Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated increments granted were withdrawn , which the Division Bench on 17.07.2006 while admitting In the index of the petition, references were made to pendency of which was disposed of on 15.03.2012 on the statement of learned counsel for the parties of it being covered by decision 2008 titled as Dr. Jagmohan Singh and others against which LPA-1818-2011 filed by the State In the case at hand, there is nothing in the written statement that the petitioner received the amount by making any misrepresentation or concealment despite best efforts, unable to resist .2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents quashing the order dated increments granted were withdrawn , which the Division Bench on 17.07.2006 while admitting were made to pendency of 15.03.2012 on the statement of learned counsel for the parties of it being covered by decision Singh and others filed by the State In the case at hand, there is nothing in the written statement that the petitioner received the amount by making any misrepresentation or concealment unable to resist ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.02 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10633-200 disposal of the petition in terms of the aforesaid judgment. 4. Ordered accordingly. 02.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2006 (O&M) disposal of the petition in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : - 2- disposal of the petition in terms of the aforesaid judgment. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.02 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document