[2025:RJ-JP:41934] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15785/2025 Jeevan Kumar Sharma S/o Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 28, Naiyon Ka Mohalla, Lakhanpur, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, (Headquarter), Sawaimadhopur. 4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Sawaimadhopur. 5. The Election Registration Officer (Sdm), Khandar, Sawaimadhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 01.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13194/2025 Kuldeep Singh Bansiwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., Order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely [2025:RJ-JP:41934] (2 of 2) [CW-15785/2025] covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and accordingly this writ petition be disposed of. 2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and followed in subsequently decided case, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondents within a period of four weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he will have a right to re-approach the Court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /88