1 2025:CGHC:2939 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5023 of 2024 1 - Toshan Kumar Dhimar S/o Shri Hemlal Dhimar, Aged About 27 Years R/o Deen Dayal Upadhyay Nagar, Near Vidya Jyoti Vidyalaya, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha Mandal (Cgvyapam), Through Controller, Vyapam Bhwan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suraj Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate on behalf of Dr. Sourabh Pande, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 16/01/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a directions towards the respondent authority to correct the name of the petitioner as “Toshan Kumar Dhimar” instead of “Toshan Dhimar” in the TET result of 2024 on the basis of 10th class mark-sheet. RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.01.17 18:44:35 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in the year 2024 was conducted by the respondent and the petitioner submitted the OnLine form for the same. The Mark- sheet was also issued in which the petitioner was found successfully eligible. He submits that inadvertently while filling the form his name has been filled as “Toshan Dhimar” in the form and his name has been shown as “Toshan Dhimar” instead of “Toshan Kumar Dhimar” in the TET result. This petition has been filed without any delay and as soon as the petitioner realized the mistake has approached this Court and also made representation to the respondent. He further submits that if the correction is not made, it would cause prejudice to the petitioner as her date of birth and name have been wrongly reflected in the TET result and by making a correction in the said result, is not going to cause any loss or prejudice to the respondent and it will not make any change in the result of the petitioner. Therefore, the relief as claimed may be granted. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that if the petitioner move a fresh representation seeking necessary correction as stated in the writ petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law within 50 days. 4. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority that, if any representation along with the documentary proof in support of his claim is filed by the petitioner for correction of the name in the 3 TET result 2024, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of 50 days in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul