IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 17538/2025 Decided on: 12.11.2025 Joginder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Mukul Sood, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of the respondents No. 1 and 2 and respondent No.3, respectively. 2. Petitioner seeks directions to respondent No.3/ Competent Authority to process his case for pension from due date with consequential benefits. It is seen from the record that petitioner has not even represented to the respondents for the redresssal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the respondent No.3/Competent Authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 4. The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 12th November, 2025(yoesh)