1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9401 of 2025 1 - Smt. Seema Thakur W/o Late Rajesh Thakur Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (L.B.) In Swami Atmanand English Medium School, Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 5 - Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 6 - District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh C.G. 7 - Block Education Officer, Kharsiya, District Raigarh C.G. 8 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 12.08. 202 5 1. The claim of the petitioner is with regard to grant of first and second Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to award of first Kramonnati and second Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu Vs. State of 2 Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioner is also entitle for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No.2 & 3/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of this case. It is for the respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 5. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder