BHAWANI SINGH CHAUHAN S/O LATE SHRI BABU SINGH CHAUHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5937/2025 · 2025-12-09
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38878 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38878 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5937/2025 Bhawani Singh Chauhan S/o Late Shri Babu Singh Chauhan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o P. No. 25, Jaishankar Colony, Mangyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur - 302020 ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Harinarayan Meena S/o Late Shri Bannaram Meena, R/o B-29, Parwana Vihar, Gajsinghpura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur - 302021 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarthak Rastogi Mr. Tushar Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP Ms. Meenal Bhargava JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/12/2025
1. The present misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR No. 515/2019 registered with Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 453, 379, 420 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989, on the basis of compromise between the parties.
2. This Court vide order dated 20.09.2025 directed the respondent No. 2-complainant to appear before the Registrar (Judicial) to depose his statements.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, statements of the respondent No. 2-complainant have been recorded by the
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5937/2025] Registrar(judicial) wherein he has admitted the factum of compromise between them and he has admitted that he does not want to prosecute the petitioner.
4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688, this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS.
5. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The impugned FIR No. 515/2019, registered with Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 453, 379, 420 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989 stands quashed.
6. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/177