Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
111-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Surjit Kaur and
State of Punjab
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH MANUJA
passed in another Versus
September 23 ‘dk kamra’
Whether Speaking / Reasoned :
Whether Reportable :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.
Date of decision: Surjit Kaur and others
Versus
Punjab and another
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate
for the appellants.
Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab
for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in RFA No. 353 of 2000, titled Versus State of Punjab and another September 23, 2025
Whether Speaking / Reasoned :
Yes Whether Reportable :
Yes
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 354 of 2000 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.09.2025
...Appellants
...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab
order, see judgment of even date , titled “Jagjit Singh and and another”.
( HARKESH MANUJA )
JUDGE
No
No Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab DINESH KUMAR 2025.09.25 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document