[2025:RJ-JP:46439] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9688/2025 Smt. Garima Devi W/o Late Nehnuram, R/o Dharmpura Walo Ki Dhani, Chenpura, P.S. Bassi, Jaipur East, Jaipur, At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma For Non-Applicant(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. B R Rana for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 94/2025 registered at Police Station Bassi District Jaipur City East for the offence(s) under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is a female, having two children, less than 7 years of age. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and applicant is behind bars ever since 07.02.2025. It is further submitted that the applicant has not been named in the FIR and there is no communication through any social media platforms between the applicant and the victim on the date of alleged [2025:RJ-JP:46439] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9688/2025] offence; nevertheless, there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail application and have drawn attention of this Court on the charge- sheet and have submitted that the applicant and the victim were in regular communication with each other through a social media platform i.e. Instagram, and there is a stout motive qua the accused-applicant, as the applicant and one Shiv Kumar were in close acquaintance and the deceased being unhappy with the said relation, often interfered therein. Nevertheless, at an erstwhile occasion also, the deceased, had consumed poison, being in trivial of the said relationship. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts, and taking note of the fact that the applicant and the victim were in regular communication with each other through a social media platform; that there was a motive to commit the said offence; that the nature of allegations are serious in nature, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/20