1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9475 of 2025 1 - Balbhadra Verma S/o Bisahu Ram Verma Aged About 44 Years R/o Ganga Nagar, Phase-1, Mangla, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - District Education Officer District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Block Education Officer Block - Bilha, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Block Education Officer Block - Masturi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Head Master Government Primary School Chilhati, Block - Masturi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Collector District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 22/08/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04/06/2025 (Annexure- P/1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Primary SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.23 11:11:38 +0530 2 School Chilhati, Block Masturi, Dist- Bilaspur to Govt. Primary School Dhuripara Mangla, Block Bilha, Dist- Bilaspur under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after declaring him surplus there. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika