SHRI.U.PAWAN KUMAR v. MASTER PRABHANAJAN ALIAS KISHAN PRABHANAJAN
WP/7152/2025 · 2025-07-28
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38860 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38860 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28849 WP No. 7152 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 7152 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SHRI.U.PAWAN KUMAR SON OF R.S.UMESH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/A HOUSE NO. 1062, 4TH PHASE, NEW KANTHRAJ URS ROAD, T.K. LAYOUT, MYSORE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKHILESH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KETHAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MASTER PRABHANAJAN ALIAS KISHAN PRABHANAJAN, SON OF U.PAWAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, RESIDING AT C/O KALAPPA GOWDA.H.G, RESIDING AT B.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, B.HOSAHALLI POST, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.
2.
SRI.DEVA KUMAR.R.S.
SON OF SUBBANNA, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS LR'S.
ANANTH, SON OF DEVAKUMAR.R.S., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28849 WP No. 7152 of 2025
3. PALLAVI, DAUGHTER OF DEVAKUMAR.R.S., AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.198/22, 5TH MAIN ROAD, VYALIKAVAL, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003.
4. SRI.R.S.UMESH, SON OF R.SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/AT NO.1063, 4TH PHASE, NEW KANTHARAJ URS ROAD, T.K.LAYOUT, MYSORE.
5.
SMT.SWARNA GOWRI, WIFE OF BALASUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.33472, PONY LOOP, FREMONT, CA-94555, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
6. SMT.U.SRIPRIYA, WIFE OF KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.38, 1ST MAIN ROAD, S.T.BED LAYOUT, 4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAKASHA.K.V., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28849 WP No. 7152 of 2025
ORAL ORDER Sri.Akhilesh., counsel on behalf of Sri.Kethan Kumar., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that O.S.No.8757/2012 has been disposed of vide Judgment dated
11.06.2025. Hence, the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Submission is noted. Memo is placed on record. The Registry concerned has furnished the E-status of O.S.No.8757/2012. A perusal of the same depicts that the suit has been disposed of on 11.06.2025. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29