SHIR. AMIT ATMARAM BHUVAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY AND ORS.
CP/179/2019 · 2025-10-13
Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38857 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38857 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
34-179-2019-CP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 179 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9730 OF 2017 Amit Atmaram Bhuvad … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Sagar Mane i/b Ms. Ashwini Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner. Ms. T.J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent – State. …………. Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ. Date : October 13, 2025.
P. C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The order breached is dated 6th October 2018. The only reason why the order had not been complied with, as seen from the affidavit-in- reply filed on behalf of the respondent – State, is that the Review Petition (St.) No.17267 of 2019 preferred by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of the order dated 6th October 2018 has been dismissed. Learned Uday S. Jagtap 1 of
3 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.10.16 20:17:00 +0530
34-179-2019-CP=.doc counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of the order dated 11th September 2023 passed by this Court, dismissing the Review Petition. Mere pendency of the Review cannot be a ground for refusal to comply with the order. However, in the interest of justice, we direct the respondents now to comply with the order breached, within a period of 4 weeks from today.
3. It is made clear that if the order is not complied with, this Court may have to take serious view of the matter and insist the presence of respondent nos. 2 and 3. We do not propose to keep the petition pending with the hope and trust that the respondents shall now be gracious to comply with the order.
4. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.
5. List on 1st December 2025, under the caption “For Compliance”. If the order is not complied with, the Contempt Petition to stand restored, in which case, we may be constrained to insist upon the personal presence of the contemnors. Uday S. Jagtap 2 of
3
34-179-2019-CP=.doc
6. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. Learned AGP to ensure this order is brought to the notice of the concerned. [ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 3 of
3