APHC010778722013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 31677/2013 Between: 1. M/S. NARAYANADRI STEEL PVT. LTD.,, VENKATA RAJAMPET, PULLAMPET MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, REGD. OFFICE AT 443/A/28, ROAD NO: 86, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD REP., BY ITS DIRECTOR A.SHILPA REDDY, W/O. VENKATESH REDDY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS ...PETITIONER AND 1. REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TIRUPATI, 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION CIRCLE, APSPDCL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER OPERATION CIRCLE, APSPDCL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M P CHANDRAMOULI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) 3. P VINOD KUMAR The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: None for the Writ Petitioner. 2. Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL, would submit that the service connection entry in question has not been in existence. In any case, there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 3. When this Writ Petition was listed on 14.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. This Court had directed the matter to be listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. 4. This matter is of the year 2013 and, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping it pending on the file of this Court inasmuch as the Writ Petitioner has not evinced any interest in prosecuting this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 6. However, there shall be a direction to the Registry to preserve the record for a period of twelve (12) weeks from today in order to enable the parties to file an appropriate Application for Restoration, if the Writ Petitioner is of the opinion that the cause of action still survives. 7. If such Application is not filed within the fixed time, the Registry is at liberty to destroy the record four (04) weeks after the expiry of the said twelve (12) weeks period. 8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 18.07.2025 DSV