Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38853 (JHR)

DIPAK KUMAR ALIAS DIPAK SAHU ALIAS DEEPAK SAHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8752/2025 · 2025-09-26

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:30667 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8243 of 2025 ------ Rajendra Sahu, aged about 66 years, son of Late Shivcharan Sahu, resident of village Katamkuli, Bandh Tola, P.O. and P.S. Pithoria, District Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party With B.A. No. 8475 of 2025 1. Pradeep Sahu, aged about 52 years, aged about 27 years, son of Shivcharan Sahu. 2. Krishna Kumar @ Krishna Sahu, aged about 27 years, son of Pradeep Sahu. Both are residents of village Kalam Kuli, Koiri Tola, P.O. and P.S.-Pithoria, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioners -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party B.A. No. 8752 of 2025 Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Sahu @ Deepak Sahu, aged about 33 Years, Son of Jagmohan Sahu, Resident of Katamkuli, Koiri Tola, P.O. and P.S. Pithoria, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : M/s. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P. : M/s. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. : M/s. Abhay Kr. Tiwary, A.P.P. For the Informant : M/s. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate ----- 02/26.09.2025 B.A. No. 8752 of 2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Bail Application. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. In B.A. No. 8243 of 2025 & B.A. No. 8475 of 2025 All these Bail Applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, they are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard the parties 3. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 93 of 2023, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 302 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of Mrs. Kanchan Kumari, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Ranchi. 4. On 12.06.2025, petitioners alongwith co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant party causing injuries to three persons. One of the injured Ashok Sahu succumbed to his injuries. 5. It was submitted that there is specific allegation against one Basant Sahu to have assaulted the deceased. As far as the petitioners are concerned, there is no allegation that they had assaulted the deceased. 6. Mr. Vikesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. In view of the submissions made above, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with each two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Mrs. Kanchan Kumari, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Ranchi in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 93 of 2023. (Ambuj Nath, J.) September 26, 2025 Nandini/- Uploaded