Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38850 (AP)

BANDI NARASIMHA RAO v. GANGURI KOTESWARAMMA

CRP/6281/2018 · 2025-01-24

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010776762018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: Bandi Narasimha Rao Ganguri Koteswaramma Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVADASS BALANTHA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6281/2018 ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: DEVADASS BALANTHA Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3505] THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT ORDER: The present revision is filed questioning the order 28.06.2018 passed in I.A.No.153 of 2018 in A.S. (S.R.) No.711 of 2018, on the file of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nandigama whereunder delay of 238 day in filing the appeal was condoned. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the District Judiciary that the main appeal in A.S.No.27 of 2018 was decreed by the Judgment and decree dated 19.10.2022. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision petition and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date:24.01.2025 TJN 269 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR C.R.P.No.6281 OF 2018 Date: 24.01.2025 TJN