Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38846 (HP)

Land Acquisition Collector v. SUNITA BASSI ALIAS NEENU AND ANR

CMP.M/1559/2025 · 2025-11-07

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

LAC & Ors. vs. Sunita Bassi @ Neenu & anr. CMP(M) No.1559 of 2025 07.11.2025 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for the applicants/appellants. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents. CMP(M) No.1559 of 2025 Learned counsel for the respondents, submits that Power of Attorney has been filed, however the same is not available on record. He is directed to follow up with the Registry in this respect. Learned counsel for the respondents has further submitted that he doesn't intend to file any reply to the present application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 20 days in filing the present appeal, which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of. RFA No.__________of 2025 Be registered. Admit. Post Admission Notice. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Call for the records. CMP No.__________of 2025 Be registered. Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of eight weeks from today, the execution of award dated 19.03.2025, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. in case titled Sunita Bassi alias Neenu & Anr.` vs. The Land Acquisition Collector & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal. Application stands disposed of. Alteration, vacation or modification on motion. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge November 07, 2025 (reena)