- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41640 WP No. 25972 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 25972 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SARIKA MANOJ AGARWAL D/O SRI KAILASH KUMAR JASRASARIA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT 1ST FLOOR, AADINATH TOWERS, No.38-5-11, 1ST MAIN ROAD, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YASHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU CITY-560022. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRASANNA V. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT No.13, RAHAT, COLES ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. MRS. JAYA GARG AGE MAJOR, D/O MR. BHAVANI SHANKAR GOYAL, DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT A-306, SIROYA ENVIRON, 24, CHOLA NAGAR, ANANDA NAGAR, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560024. Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41640 WP No. 25972 of 2025 3. MRS. JAYANTI CHHAWCHHARIA, AGE MAJOR, D/O MR. BHAVANI SHANKAR GOYAL, DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT No.10C, GEM HOUSE, 5B RESEL STREET, MIDDLETON ROW, KOLKATTA-700071. 4. MR. MERLIN RORY PICARDO, AGE MAJOR, S/O JOSEPH PICARDO, DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIED PVT. LTD., R/AT 2-81B, HALSUS PANDESHWARA, UDUPI, KARNATAKA-576226. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 26.06.2025 IN IA No.3 TO 5 IN COM. OS No.627/2021 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED LXXXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-90) VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER Sri V.R. Prasanna, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave of this Court to urge all the contentions raised in the present petition before the concerned Court at the appropriate stage. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41640 WP No. 25972 of 2025 2. It is needless to observe that those submissions would merit consideration by the concerned Court at the appropriate stage. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE MV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14