Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38838 (RAJ)

MAHESH @ BABLI S/O JAGNYA @ JAGANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12448/2025 · 2025-10-13

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41607] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12448/2025 Mahesh @ Babli S/o Jagnya @ Jaganlal, R/o Village Mandawar, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 107/2024 registered at Police Station Mandawar District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 336, 354, 504 of IPC. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that cross FIR was lodged after a delay of two days, by each of the sides on account of ongoing fight qua the street/ encroachment thereof. It is further submitted that compromise has been entered inter-se the parties as per annexure-4. It is also submitted that co-accused assigned with grievous injuries, has been enlarged on bail. It is also submitted that co-accused (Rena) under similar circumstances has been given benefit of anticipatory bail and the applicant is on same pedestal as that with co-accused (Rena). [2025:RJ-JP:41607] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12448/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application. 4. Having heard the contentions made by the counsel representing both the parties, upon a perusal of the material available on record, and on account of the fact that the cross FIRs have been lodged after a delay of approximately two days by both the parties; and that the parties have entered into compromise, this Court is inclined to allow the anticipatory bail application subject to a condition that applicant shall join the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer concerned on 30.10.2025 at 11:00 am. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa in F.I.R. No. 107/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Mahesh @ Babli S/o Jagnya @ Jaganlal, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station. Withal, following conditions are also imposed upon the applicant:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; and if the applicant fails to join and render due cooperation in the investigation or does not mark appearance before the concerned authority, as directed hereinabove, the present order allowing anticipatory bail to the applicant shall cease to operate; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and [2025:RJ-JP:41607] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12448/2025] (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/224