APHC010765242018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 37108/2018 Between: 1. RAYUDU SURYAKUMARI, W/O.LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.H.NO.16-33-12/2, SAMBAMURTHYNAGAR, 1ST STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, III TOWN POLICE STATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. RAYUDU PUSHPAKUMARI, W/O.LATE PRAKASARAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.H.NO.16-33-1/2, SAMBAMURTYNAGAR, 1ST STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 7. RAYUDU SATYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC MECHANIC, R/O.H.NO.16-33-1/2, SAMBAMURTYNAGAR, 1ST STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.37108 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in not registering the report dated 11.7.2018 as FIR submitted by the petitioner against the respondents 6 and 7 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to register the report as FIR against the respondents 6 and 7 and pass…” 2. No fresh vakalat filed for the petitioner. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournments. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 15.09.2025 Pmk 4 13 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:37108 OF 2018 Date: 15.08.2025 Pmk