DR. REDDYLABORATORIES LTD v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GmbH AND ANR
OSA/2/2022 · 2025-12-18
Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia, Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38834 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38834 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Main Case OSA/1/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA OSA No. 02 of 2022 Date of decision: 18.12.2025. ________________________________________________________ Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. …..Appellant Versus Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH & another
...Respondents ________________________________________________________
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ For the Appellant: Ms. Shradha Karol, Advocate (through V.C.) with Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocate For the Respondents: Ms. Arpita Sawaney, Advocate (through V.C.) with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Atul Jhingan, Mr. Priyansh Sharma, Mr. Ankit Thakur and Ms. Akanksha Chauhan, Advocates. G.S. Sandhawalia
, Chief Justice
(Oral)
Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled the matter and placed on record a copy of the Settlement Agreement dated 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
18.07.2025 in a sealed envelope, which has been opened by us.
2. Perusal of the said Agreement would go on to show that the Commercial Suit bearing COMS No. 05 of 2021, titled as Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH & another Vs. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. and related proceedings in COPC No. 465 of 2021, titled as Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH & another Vs. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. & others and COPC No. 337 of 2022, titled as Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH & another Vs. G.V. Prasad, are sought to be withdrawn by the plaintiffs-respondents herein. Similarly, the defendant-appellant herein, has also agreed to withdraw the appeal pending before us.
3. In such circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that the appeal has become infructuous in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous.
3
4. Since the original Settlement Agreement in the suit is not placed in the appeal proceedings, it is open to the parties to place the same on record before the learned Single Judge. The copy of the Settlement Agreement which has been opened by us, is re-sealed.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of.
(G.S. Sandhawalia)
Chief Justice. December 18, 2025
(Jiya Lal Bhardwaj) (hemlata)
Judge.