M/ s.Brilliant industries Ltd., v. The Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyd
WP/38483/2012 · 2025-07-20
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38834 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38834 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010774982012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD- WRIT PETITION NO: 38483 OF 2012 - Between:
1. M/s. Brilliant industries Ltd., Unit-2 of Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Ltd., Gondiparla (V), Kurnool District.,
2. M/s.Rayalaseema Duch Kasenbow, Unit-3 of Sree Rayalaseema Hi- Strength Hypo Ltd., Gondiparla (V), Kurnool District.,
3. T.G.V.Pharma (P) Ltd., Unit-4 of Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Ltd., Gondiparla (V), Kurnool district. 1 to 3 repstd. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Mr.T.G.Bharath, office at K.J.Complex, Bhagya Nagar, Kurnool - 51800^
4. Sree Rayalaseema Galaxy Projects (P) Ltd., Gondiparla (V), Kurnool District., repstd., by its Director Mr.E.Thirupal Babu, Office at K.J.Complex, Bhagya Nagar, Kurnool - 518004. ...Petitioners AND
1. The Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Hyd
2. APCPDCL Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution, Corporation- Limited), Hyderabad. 3. The Superintending Engineer APCPDCL Kurnool
4. The Senior Accounts Officer APCPDCL Kurnool
5. The Chief General Manager APCPDCL Hyderabad
6. The Government of Andhra Pradesh repstd by its, Principal Secretary (Energy). 7.
The Commissionerate of Industries Hyderabad ^ ...Respondents^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the all the Respondent(s), viz., as the 2 nd Respondent and other three Discerns led by the 5 Respondent committing fraud on the consumers by declaring that there was power in the state, while having the same and further actions of i Restrictions and no imposing measures' regarding consumption of Electricity, imposing penalties of 6 or 7 times of consumption, on the basis of the orders of the 1st Respondent Proceedings no.APERC/Secy/ 16/2012-13 dated 01.11.2012, based on repealed Proceeding No .APERC/ 14.09.2012, dated.07.09.2012, Secy/ 14/2012-13 dated a supersession of Proceeding APERC/Secy/13/2012-13 viz the lot and the 6th Respondent for abdicating duty towards state, while the 7th Respondent offers expensive power, as against provisions of the public policy, illegal, arbitrary, improper and contrary to the law and violative of word 'Socialist' in the Preamble of the Constitution of India, violative of Art.14, Art.19(1)(g) and Art.21 of the constitution of India consequentially set aside all the questionable Proceedings of the 1® respondent Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G SUNDARA RAJAN (Not Present)^ Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI CH N MEHAR BABA, COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI Counsel for the Respondents No.2 to 5: M/S. JYOTHI RATNA A, LEARNED JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL REPRESENTING VENKATA RAMA RAO The Court Made the Following Order: LEARNED SRI
1 APHC010774982012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 38483/2012 Between: 1.M/ S.BRILLIANT INDUSTRIES LTD. RAYALASEEMA HI-STRENGTH HYPO LTD., GONDIPARLA (V) KURNOOL DISTRICT.,
2.
M/S.RAYALASEEMA DUCH KASENBOW RAYALASEEMA HI-STRENGTH HYPO LTD. KURNOOL DISTRICT, UNIT-2 OF SREE UNIT-3 OF SREE GONDIPARLA (V), ) ] 3.TG.V.PHARMA (P) LTD. UNIT-4 OF SREE RAYALASEEMA HI- STRENGTH HYPO LTD., GONDIPARLA (V), KURNOOL DISTRICT. 1 TO 3 REPSTD. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.T.G.BHARATH, OFFICE AT K.J.COMPLEX, BHAGYA NAGAR, KURNOOL-518004. 5 3
4. SREE RAYALASEEMA GALAXY PROJECTS (P) LTD (V), KURNOOL DISTRICT. GONDIPARLA REPSTD., BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.E.THIRUPAL BABU, OFFICE AT K.J.COMPLEX, BHAGYA NAGAR, KURNOOL-518004. • 3 3 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION HYD, - 2.APCPDCL ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION, CORPORATION LIMITED), HYDERABAD. 3.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER APCPDCL KURNOOL, -
4. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER APCPDCL KURNOOL, -
2 5.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER APCPDCL 6.THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (ENERGY). 7.THE COMMISSIONERATE OF INDUSTRIES HYDERABAD, - HYDERABAD, - PRADESH REPSTD BY ITS, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitloner(S):
1.G SUNDARARAJAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI The Court made the following: ORALORDFR- There is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. 2. Ms. Jyothi Ratna A, learned Junior Standing Counsel Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel Ch.N. Mehar Baba, learned Counsel
learned Counsel for the Respondents representing Sri for APSPDCL and Sri representing Sri Srinivasa Rao Putiuri are present.
3. This matter was last listed on 27.11.2019, when Writ Petitioners. none appeared for the
4.
Learned Counsel for the Respondents would submit that this Writ Petition has become infruotuous and nothing survives in the matter. This matter is of the
5. year 2012 and, therefore, this Court is of the served by keeping it pending on the not evinced any opinion that no useful purpose would be file of this Court inasmuch interest in prosecuting this Writ Petition. as the Writ Petitioners have Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution ,
order as to costs. No
3
7. However, there shall be a direction to the Registry to preserve the record for a period of twelve (12) weeks from today in order to enable the parties to file an appropriate Application for Restoration, if the Writ Petitioners are of the opinion that the cause of action still survives. If such Application is not filed within the fixed time, the Registry is at liberty to destroy the record four (04) weeks after the expiry of the said twelve (12) weeks period as per the procedure. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
8.
Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SR! G SUNDARA RAJAN Advocate [OPUC] ^
2. One CC to SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] ''
3. One CC to SRI SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies GSG
HIGH COURT DATED: 21/07/2025 \
ORDER WP NO. 38483 OF 2012 I 0 SEP 2025 tSSSTOHSMm^^ b) O DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS