IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 19464 and 19462/2025 Decided on: 10.12.2025 1. CWP No. 19464/2025 Rajesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 19462/2025 Ramesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Harmohan Thakur, Advocate vice Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate in both the matters. For the respondent(s): Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General in both the matters. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in all the matters. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Assistant Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Mohit Sharma2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th December, 2025(rohit) 2CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024