APHC010775212018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37617/2018 Between: 1. KANALA SESHI REDDY,, S/O KANALA GALI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC . CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF CHIKATEEGALA PALEM, VINUKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KANALA LAKSHMI,, W/O KANALA SESHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC . CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF CHIKATEEGALA PALEM, VINUKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, INAVOLU POLICE STATION,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. KAMATAM VENKATA PRASANNA, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS STATION HOUSE OFFICER, INAVOLU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. GUNDAM VENKAT REDDY, S/O SUNDARA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. LINGAMUKKAPALLI, H/O. CHINTALACHERUVU, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 6. DIRISALA VENKATA RAMANAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RJO. OLD NAGIREDDYPALLI, H/O. CHINTALACHERUVU, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes inspite of an order of injunction by a competent Civil Court in I.A.No. 947/2017 in O.S.No. 461/2017, dt. 18.09.2017 and the inaction of the 2nd respondent in doing justice to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution and consequently direct the 4 th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes in the capacity of the 3rd respondent and further direct the 2nd respondent to take action and to do justice to the petitioners, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes in the capacity of the 3rd respondent and further direct the 2nd respondent to take action and to do justice to the petitioners, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes inspite of an order of injunction by a competent Civil Court in I.A.No. 947/2017 in O.S.No. 461/2017, dt. 18.09.2017 and the inaction of the 2nd respondent in doing justice to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution and consequently direct the 4 th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes in the capacity of the 3rd respondent and further direct the 2nd respondent to take action and to do justice to the petitioners, and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri NVR Amaranth, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police at the instance of the 3rd respondent are interfering in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that they are not interfering in the civil dispute and no crime has been registered against the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the above submission, this writ petition may be disposed of. 6. In that view, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.07.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 105 WRIT PETITION NO: 37617/2018 Dt.17.07.2025 MH