IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2493 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Reeta Devi …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Proxy Counsel vice M.A.Safee, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated Nil, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 09.10.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Director of School Education (Ele), Mandi, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General states that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused the aforesaid communications, which are taken on record, this Court finds that in terms of the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, respondents after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of judgment 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma’s case, has granted her higher pay scale. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months, failing, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken against the erring officials. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 10,2025 (shankar)