LATE BIRBAL SINGH AND ORS v. JUDGE RENT APPELLAT TRIBUNAL ORS
CW/6888/2011 · 2025-09-08
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38827 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38827 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35964] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6888/2011
1. Late Birbalsingh S/O Bhartaram Jat (Since deceased) through his L.R.S 1/1.Mohanidevi W/o Late Shri Birbalram aged 60 yrs R/o Vill. Sulkhania Distt. Churu Rajasthan 1/2. Dayanand aged 31 years 1/3.Shravan Kumar aged 28 years Both S/O Late Shri Birbalram aged R/o Vill. Sulkhania Distt. Churu Rajasthan At present Maruti Courier Service First Floor, Opposite Sessions Court, Court Road Sikar. 1/4. Subhita aged 35 years 1/5. Kamla aged 33 years Both D/o Late Shri Birbalram aged R/o Vill. Sulkhania Distt. Churu Rajasthan At present Maruti Courier Service First Floor, Opposite Sessions Court, Court Road Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Judge Rent Appellate Tribunal, Sikar
2. Judge Rent Tribunal, Sikar
3. Vinod Kumar S/O Late Shri Kumar Narain Aged 65 years R/O ward No. 28 Mohalla Sekh pura, Sikar Distt. Sikar Rajasthan (LAND LORD).
4. Mamraj Pilania President Ex Soldiers Evam Varistha nagrik Seva Samiti Kisan Colony, Nawalgarh Road, Near Subodh public School, Sikar Distt. Sikar Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.C.S. Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 08/09/2025
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners.
[2025:RJ-JP:35964] (2 of 2) [CW-6888/2011]
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the possession of the subject land has been taken from the petitioners on 07.07.2025 and the same has been returned to the respondents, hence, the petitioners have no cause of action to continue with this writ petition and under the changed circumstances, this writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Considering the above submissions, the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as rendered infructuous. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed.
4. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an application for revival of this writ petition and for recalling of this
order, in case, any cause of action/ grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /68