Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38823 (AP)

TRV Prasad Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/2770/2018 · 2025-07-02

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010769492018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2770 OF 201« Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P C. against the Order dt. 3i08.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2826 of 2017 in C.C.No.305 of 2016 on the filb of the court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Chilakaluripet. Between: TRV Prasad Reddy. S/o. Malla Reddy, aged 45 years. Survey Number 158/3, Uppalagutta, Tripuranthakam Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner/Accused AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...Respondent 2. Bandarupalli Hari Prasad, S/o. Jagan Mohana years, R/o. Satuluru Village, Nadendia Mandal, Guntur District. Rao, aged about 28 ...Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Kolluri Arjun Chowdary Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following order: ^PHC010769492018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2770/2018 Eiptween: TRV PRASAD REDDY, SURVEY NUMBER 158/3, UPPALAGUTTA, TRIPURANTHAKAM VILLAGE DISTRICT. AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2.BANDARUPALLI HARI PRASAD, R/0. SATULURU VILLAGE, NADENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1.THE ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: KOLLURI ARJUN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) \ A 2 The Court made the following: \ \ ORDER: 1 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. As seen from the E-Courts report, the main case i.e., C.C.No.305 of 2016 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chilakaluripet, was dismissed as not pressed. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/-VDIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class: Chilakaluripet, Guntur District. 2. One CC to Sri Kolluri Arjun Chowdary Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies SAM nm 1 ■ X-. 9 ' \ \ 1 high court DATED;03;07/2025 I ORDER CRLRC No. 2770 of 2018 I f 22SEPWW toll % Current Ejection ^ CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS dismissing the -L =• ^ i 'Mi:-