Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3882 (UTT)

Ramesh Chandra Mandoliya v. Smt. Ashi Mandoliya

C482/164/2018 · 2025-01-08

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:292 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C482 No.164 of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. There is no representation for the applicant. Mr. Yash Bisht, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for the respondents. 2. Applicant has sought quashing of order dated 15.112017 passed by learned Additional Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Case No.92 of 2017 filed by respondents, seeking maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. By the said order, applicant was directed to pay ₹12,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the respondents. 3. As per letter dated 10.12.2024 received from Additional Judge-Ist, Family Court, Dehradun, Execution Case No.92 of 2017 was decided by Family Court vide order dated 13.10.2023. 4. After decision in the maintenance case, challenge thrown to an interlocutory order passed in the said case do not survive. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 08.01.2025 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb 7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB98744 6351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2025.01.09 13:04:34 +05'30' 2025:UHC:292