Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38819 (AP)

Kuruva Maddilety, v. The District Collector,

WP/11509/2013 · 2025-06-25

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010770672013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11509/2013 Between: 1. KURUVA MADDILETY,, S/O. LATE. KURUVA KARRENNA, AGED ABOUT : 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. DINNEDEVARAPADU VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. KURUVA MADDILETI,, S/O. LATE SAVARANNA, AGED ABOUT: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. DINNEDEVARAPADU VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR N H 18 4 LINE WORK COMPETENT, AUTHORITY, COLLECTOR OFFICE, KURNOOL CITY. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL DIVISION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NANDYAL DIVISION, NANDYAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent SRS,J W.P.No.11509 of 2013 herein in declaring the agriculture land in Sy.No.168/F2 to an extent of Acs.0.37 cents and Acs. 0.13 cents as Government land, situated at Dinnedevarapadu Village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District. The 2nd respondent in not entertaining the objection application that the land in Sy.No168/F2 is a patta land. The 2nd Resp. awarded the same as Government land vide Award No.05/2012 in Rc.No.G1/2573/2010 dated 13.07.2012 is illegal arbitrary and against the Principal of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 2"ciResp. herein to pay the land compensation @ Rs.11,00,000/- per acre. The total compensation of Rs.4,07,000/- to the petitioner No:1 and The total compensation of Rs.1,43,000/- to the petitioner No:2 as the land is a patta land and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 14265 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the awarded as Government land vide Award No.05/2012 in Rc.No.G1/2573/2010 dated 13.07.2012 pertaining to SY.No.168/F2 to an extent of Acs.0.37 Cents and Acs.0.13 cents till the disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 70486 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATESWARLU VALMIKI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. 3. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) The Court made the following order: The above writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “… declaring the action of the 2nd respondent herein in declaring the agriculture land in survey No.168/F2 to an extent of Ac.0-37 cents and Ac.0-13 cents as Government land, situated at SRS,J W.P.No.11509 of 2013 Dinnedevarapadu Village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District. The 2nd respondent in not entertaining the objection application that the land in Sy.No.168/F2 is a patta land. The 2nd Resp. awarded the same as Government land vide Award No.05/2012 in Rc.No.G1/2573/2010 dated 13.07.2012 is illegal arbitrary and against the Principal of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 2nd Resp. herein to pay the land compensation @ Rs.11,00,000/- per acre. The total compensation of rs.4,07,0000/- to the petitioner No:1 and The total compensation of Rs.1,43,000/- to the petitioner No:2 as the land is a patta land and to pass such other order or orders …” 2. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was listed on 17.04.2013 and 24.06.2024, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption „for dismissal‟. 3. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption „for dismissal‟, there is no representation for the petitioners either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 26.06.2025 IKN SRS,J W.P.No.11509 of 2013 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11509 of 2013 Date: 26.06.2025 IKN