BABUDHAN HEMBRAM ALIAS BABUDHAN HEMBROM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8683/2025 · 2025-09-26
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38818 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38818 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:30586 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8683 of 2025
------ Babudhan Hembram @ Babudhan Hembrom, aged about 26 years, S/o Late Ukil Hembrom, resident of Village Namumandhara (Meghraipara), P.O. Laikapur, P.S. – Bagdehari, District –Jamtara (Jharkhand)
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pranabesh Kr. Paul, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 26.09.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bagdehari P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 96 of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner enticed away the minor victim girl and solemnized marriage with her. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that in her statement under Section 180 of the BNSS, the victim has categorically stated that as her parents were not inclined for her marriage with the petitioner, hence she voluntarily went with the petitioner to Tamil Nadu. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –11 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.06.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamtara, in connection with Bagdehari P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
26.09.2025
Sonu-Gunjan/