APHC010778252013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 834 OF 2013 Between: 1. Pinnamaneni Seetharama Prasad, S/o Late Satyanarayana, Hindu, R/o D.No.3-18, Goshala Centre, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna Dist. ...Petitioner AND 1. Aluru Naga Lakshmi, W/o Srinivasa Rao, R/o D.No.21-5-38, Vanapalavari street, Muthyalampadu, vijayawaada, Krishna Dist. 2. Palakurthi Veera Venkata Haranath Babu, S/o Satyanarayana Murthy, Hindu, R/o D.No.21-5-38, Vanapalavari street, Muthyalampadu, vijayawaada, Krishna Dist. 3. Sri Prasannajaneya Swamy Devasthanam Trust, Rep by its Secretary V Bhupal Raju, R/o D.No.21-5-38, Vanapalavari street, Muthyalampadu, vijayawaada, Krishna Dist. 4. K C P Sugars Factory Limited, Vuyyuru, Krishna Dist, Rep by its Plant Manager, Vuyyuru, Krishna Dist. 2 5. L I C India, Divisional Office, Machilipatnam, Rep by its Personal Senior Divisional Manager, Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist./ 6. G Ranga Rao, S/o Late Nagaiah, Hindu, Kallepallevari Street, Ramakrishnapuram, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 7. K Venkateswara Rao, S/o Chenchaiah, Hindu, R/o Nandmurnagar, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. (R-2 to 7 are not necessary parties) ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: .,P A SESHU Counsel for the Respondents: Y NAGAIAH The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 18.08.2025, the following order was passed: “ I.A.No.1 of 2018 is an application filed by the proposed appellant Nos.2 to 4, who are legal representatives of deceased appellant to bring them on record in place of deceased. 2. On 07.07.2025, the following order was passed: “Sri Sivalenka Ramachandra Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant on record, is present and submits that he had given a no objection vakalat long back. 2. Ms.Sophia, learned counsel, submits that Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned Senior Advocate, will be appearing in the matter to advance arguments, and prays for an adjournment. 3. Post the matter on 28.07.2025.” 3 3. On 28.07.2025, the following order was passed: “Sri P.A.Seshu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant through virtual mode, prays for time to obtain latest instructions from the appellant. List on 18.08.2025.” 4. Sri P.A.Seshu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the proposed appellants have taken record long back and he has no instructions from the appellant. 5. List on 10.09.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. 2. Sri Manoj Aragonda, learned counsel representing the appellant’s counsel, Sri P.A.Seshu, appears through virtual mode and reports that the appellant had taken the record long back. 3. Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 10.09.2025 Pab 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM A.S.NO.834 /2013 Date:- 10.09.2025 Pab 5