Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38809 (KAR)

DR. SANJUKUMAR ROY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3576/2023 · 2025-11-18

D K Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47200 WP No. 3576 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH WRIT PETITION NO. 3576 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. DR. SANJUKUMAR ROY S/O AROBINDU ROY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, "TRISHA PILES CLINIC", OPP. A.C.OFFICE, MADHUGIRI, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI NAIK N R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND CHAIRMAN OF REGISTRATION COMMITTEE FOR KARNATAKA PRIVATE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47200 WP No. 3576 of 2023 3. THE DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. 4. THE DISTRICT SECRETARY DISTRICT AYUSH OFFICER, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. 5. THE TALUK HEALTH OFFICER MADHUGIRI GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.2 TO ACCEPT THE APPLICATION DATED 23.12.2016 FILED FOR REGISTRATION WITHOUT ANY CLARIFICATION FROM RESPONDENT NO.3 AND PLACE THE SAME BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.2, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47200 WP No. 3576 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner claims to be a Bachelor of Alternative System of Medicines. The petitioner has not produced his degree certificate for this medical course. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also not in a position to tell the Court from which university and from which college the petitioner has acquired such a degree. Learned counsel, however, submits that he would like to withdraw this writ petition and file afresh with complete details. 3. Considering the aforesaid fact and the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE BKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8