cznz:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE O t: r' O "Vi PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14744 OF 2016 Between: Qnananda Ahsram @ Ramananda Ahsram, Sadhu Mutt, rep by its Peetadhipathi Swami Poornanadha Saraswathi, S/o Gnananda Swami, Aged 56 years, Venkojipalem, Visakhpatnam Andhra Pradesh State. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, A.P. Charitable & Hindu Religious Institution and Endowments Departments Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner (Andhra Pradesh State), Endowment Department, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh State. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments Department, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District Andhra Pradesh State. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent interfering with the construction of Cattleshed (Gosala) in the Mutt premises is illegal, arbitrary, against law and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with raising of cattle sheds in the petitioner’s Mutt. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWVMP. NO: 2071 OF 2016) 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, A.P. Charitable & Hindu Religious Institution and Endowments Departments Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner (Andhra Pradesh State), Endowment Department, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments Department, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District Andhra Pradesh State. ...Petitioners AND 1. Gnananda Ahsram @ Ramananda Ahsram, Sadhu Mutt, rep by its Peetadhipathi Swami Poornanadha Saraswathi, S/o Gnananda Swami, Aged 56 years, Venkojipalem, Visakhpatnam Andhra Pradesh State. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh State. (R2 is not necessary party.) ...Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order passed in WPMP No. 18342/2016 in WP No. 14744 of 2016 dated 27.04.2016. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 18342 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with raising of cattle shed (gosala) in the premises of Petitioner's Mutt pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. M CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following order: V * APHC010773252016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14744/2016 Between: Gnananda Ahsram @ Ramananda Ahsram, Sadhu Mutt, AND ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2.ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent interfering with the construction of Cattle shed Gosala in the Mutt premises is illegal, arbitrary against law and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with raising of cattie sheds in the petitioner’s Mutt and pass 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M. Chalapathi Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, during pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner has raised Cattle shed Gosala in the Mutt premises. So, nothing survives in the present writ petition for further adjudication and by recording the same, it may be closed. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents does not refute the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Recording the above submissions, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- A.VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. M Chalapati Rao Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:18/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.14744 of 2016 X 11 MAK 2025 a^ . Current Section . CLOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS