Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38801 (AP)

Omkaram Madhavi v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/37139/2018 · 2025-04-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010770372018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37139/2018 Between: Omkaram Madhavi ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K PALLAVI 2. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the 2nd respondent orders in Proceedings No.84/A5/2018 dated 29.09.2018 thereby appointing 4th respondent herein without considering petitioner's representation dated 10.04.2018 to promote her as Anganwadi Worker in respect of Seetharamapuram Main Aganwadi Center, Seetharamapuram Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, contrary to guidelines in memo No.5771/K3/2006 dated 05.01.2012 of the Director, 2 Women Development and Child Welfare, Andhra Pradesh, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently suspend the 2nd respondent orders in Proceedings No.84/A5/2018 dated 29.09.2018 with respect to transfer of 4th respondent herein as Anganwadi Worker in respect of Seetharamapuram Main Aganwadi Center, Seetharamapuram Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and pass such other order or orders……” 2. None represented for the petitioner. The proceeding sheet dated 17.04.2025 also shows there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare is in attendance. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.04.2025 ARR 3 22 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37139/2018 Dt.24.04.2025 ARR