Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3880 (JHR)

DR GULAM RABBANI v. JHARKHAND COMBINED ENTRANCE COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION COUNCIL THROUGH ITS EXAMINATION CONTROLLER

WPC/184/2020 · 2025-08-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:21383] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.184 of 2020 ------ 1. Dr. Gulam Rabbani, [Aged about 35 years] son of Akbar Ali, resident of village & Post- Saranda, P.S. Birni, District- Giridih [Jharkhand] 2. Dr. Birendra Kumar Mandal [Aged about 39 years] son of Ami Lal Mandal, resident of village Panki, P.O. & P.S. Panki, District- Palamau [Jharkhand] .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. Jharkhand Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Council through its Examination Controller, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi 2. Director, AYUSH [Ayurveda Yoga Unani Sidha Homeopathy], State AYUSH Committee, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi. 3. State of Jharkhand through its Principal Secretary, Health Education & Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. (Nepal House) Doranda, District- Ranchi 4. Mission Director, Jharkhand Rural Health Mission, (JRHM), P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District-Ranchi .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, GA V Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to GA V Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Pratyush, Advocate ------ Order No:-07 Dated:-01-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respondents. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in this Writ Petition, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/