Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-868-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.04.2025 SONIA DEVI ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS POOJA RANI ...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. G. S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned
order dated 03.02.2025 is only an interim order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Karnal and the next date fixed for hearing in the main appeal is 07.04.2025 and he may be granted permission to move an appropriate application before the learned Sessions Judge, Karnal to the effect that even an interim order could not have been passed at variance with the order dated 04.03.2024 passed by the learned JMIC, Karnal because there was no stay of the aforesaid order passed by the learned JMIC, Karnal. He further submitted that considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage, with permission to the petitioner to file a fresh petition at an appropriate stage.
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) 01.04.2025 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2025.04.03 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.