APHC010765112012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8792/2012 Between: 1. B. KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. PRAKASH RAO UN SUDARSHAN RETD. TEACHER, INDIRA NAGAR, YERRAGONDAPALEM POST, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 1. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, RANGANADHAM GARDENS, CHENNAI 2. THE AREA MANAGER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, SECUNDERABAD 3. THE TERRITORY MANAGER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA 4. N SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. CHINA CHANDRAIAH R/I, RAYAVARAM, MACHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DI Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an order or direction or Writ, more particularly one the of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in not considering the representation/ complaint, dt. 22.10.2011, with regard to the irrigularities committed by the beneficiaty i.e. 4th respondent herein at the time of alloting the retail outlet in Macherala Town of Guntur District, and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and biased and also in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the official respondents to act in accordance with law and to pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8792/2012 B. KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. PRAKASH RAO UN-EMPLOYEE C/O. SUDARSHAN RETD. TEACHER, INDIRA NAGAR, YERRAGONDAPALEM POST, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, RANGANADHAM GARDENS, ANNA NAGAR, THE AREA MANAGER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, SECUNDERABAD THE TERRITORY MANAGER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA N SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. CHINA CHANDRAIAH R/I, RAYAVARAM, MACHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an order or direction or Writ, more particularly one the of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in not considering the representation/ complaint, dt. 22.10.2011, with regard to the irrigularities committed by the beneficiaty i.e. 4th respondent herein at the time the retail outlet in Macherala Town of Guntur District, and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and biased and also in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the official respondents to h law and to pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3459] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM EMPLOYEE C/O. SUDARSHAN RETD. TEACHER, INDIRA NAGAR, ...PETITIONER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, REP BY ITS ANNA NAGAR, THE AREA MANAGER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION THE TERRITORY MANAGER BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION N SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. CHINA CHANDRAIAH R/I, RAYAVARAM, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an order or direction or Writ, more particularly one the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in not considering the representation/ complaint, dt. 22.10.2011, with regard to the irrigularities committed by the beneficiaty i.e. 4th respondent herein at the time the retail outlet in Macherala Town of Guntur District, and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and biased and also in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the official respondents to 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 11108 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to consider the representation/ complaint, dt. 22.10.2011, submitted by the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P VENUGOPAL 2. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.08.2025 GRL 3 201 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8792 of 2012 Date: 12.08.2025 GRL