Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35038 WP No. 26708 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 26708 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
SRI. VENKATAJOGI S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKA VENKATAJOGI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT UDDINABOREKAVALU VILLAGE, MANDAGERE POST, KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 423. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUPRITHA K.H, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, MS BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 434. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35038 WP No. 26708 of 2025 MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 426. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS (ADLR), KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 426. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16.04.2025 VIDE ANNX-F, F1 TO F3 RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that when online application for podi and durast was made by the petitioner, the computer has generated information that there is RTC mismatch and therefore, the application is not
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35038 WP No. 26708 of 2025 accepted online. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been informed that there is a mismatch between the RTC and Akarbandh and therefore, the petitioner will have to approach the Assistant Commissioner, Pandavapura, to rectify the mistake. If such is the information given to the petitioner, this Court cannot direct the Tahsildar to accept the application for phodi without rectifying the mistake. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Assistant Commissioner, Pandavapura Taluk and get the mistake rectified in accordance with law.
If such application/petition/appeal is filed by the petitioner, the Assistant Commissioner shall pass necessary orders after issuing notice to all concerned, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date when which the application is filed. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35038 WP No. 26708 of 2025 Learned High Court Government Pleader is pemitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13 CT: BHK