1 2025:CGHC:31472 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3528 of 2019 1 - Saraswati Didi Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samuh Village Parpodi, Block Saja, District Bemetara Through Its President Sarita Dewangan, W/o Santulal Dewangan, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Parpodi, Tahsil Saja, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Woman And Child Development, New Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Programme Officer Woman And Child Development, Collectorate, Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Jai Ma Shitla Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Through Its President, Lalpur, Block Saja, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two round For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07/07/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.i To kindly call for the records of the case from the respondents. 10.ii To kindly quash the impugned order dated 12/09/2019 (received on 20/09/2019 passed by the Collector, Bemetara (Annexure P/1) and consequent order dated 18/09/2019 (received on 23/09/2019) (Annexure P/2) passed by the District Program Officer. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.07.09 15:06:12 +0530 2 10.iii To kindly direct the respondents to act strictly in accordance with law and permit the petitioner to complete the contract period without any further obstruction. 10.iv To kindly make any other order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding of the costs to the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3 would submit that the petitioner has sought relief(s) to allow the petitioner to complete the contract period of supply of ready to eat meal. He would submit that the period of contract would have expired during pendency of this petition. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that that the agreement was entered into between the parties on 10.08.2018 and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two round, therefore, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. The interim order granted on 27.09.2019 is hereby vacated. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti