Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38789 (AP)

Smt. Yadla Ammannamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26232/2015 · 2025-01-21

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

a > IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26232 OF 2015 Between: Smt. Yadia Ammannamma, W/o. Yadia Satyanarayana, aged 38 years R/o. H No. 9-33, Santhosh Nagar Annapurna Residency, Pendurthi Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its PrI. Secretary, Revenue Department (Endowments-IV) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Executive Officer, Sri Varaha Laxmi Narasimha Swamy Devasthanam Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in threatening to interfere with the construction activities of the petitioner house bearing No. 9-33, Santhosh Nagar, Annapurna Residency, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam, is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violation of Articles, 14 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents obstruct with the construction of the house of the petitioner. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015tWPMP. NO: 34076 OF 2015^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the construction of the house of the petitioner house bearing No. ^-33, Santhosh Nagar, Annapurna Residency, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the main writ petition. not to lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the additional material papers in W.P.No.26232 of 2015, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s MSVS SUDHA RANI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following order: APHC010770082015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) IS [3310] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE t PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26232/2015 Between: Smt. YadIa Ammannamma, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MSVS SUDHA RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: Order: Heard Smt M.S.V.S.Sudha Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for the respondents. 2. On hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite her best efforts, no instructions could be received from the petitioner. ■ 3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any. shall also stand closed. . . Sd/-V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OrriCER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to M/s. MSVS Sudha Rani Advocate [OPUO Two CCs to GP For Endowments, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 2. 3. Three CD Copies GSC ■ -# HIGH COURT DATED:21/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.26232 of 2015 ^roFAWoi^ o ’/x I ’ FES 2C?J lO ^ Current Section DISMISSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS