1 2025:CGHC:40747 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 213 of 2025 Ekta Swa Sahayata Samuh Through Its President Sector-3, Balco, District Korba C.G. ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Under Secretary, Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector, Food Department Branch, Korba, District Korba C.G. 3 -Sub Divisional Officer (R) Korba, District Korba C.G. 4 - Block Division Education Officer, Korba, District Korba C.G. 5 - Mano Kanta Paul Principal Swami Atmanand English School, Balco Korba, District Korba C.G. 6 - Ujala Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samuh Through President Shabana Ansari W/o Imamuddin Ansari, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Pump House Korba, District Korba C.G. (Petitioner In Writ Petition) 7 - Kausal Prasad R/o Bhadrapara, Ward No. 40, Balco Nagar, District Korba C.G. 8 - Shakun Thakur R/o Bhadrapara, Ward No. 40, Balco Nagar, District Korba C.G. ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA. For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 13.08.2025 1. The applicant has filed this review petition with following reliefs: “3. Reliefs Sought : (i) To kindly consider the application of review of the applicant and recall the order dated 28/7/2025 in Writ Petition (C) No. 3975/2025. (ii) To kindly make any other order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. The instant review petition is filed by the applicant/Ekta Swa Sahayata Samuh, who was respondent No.6 in the original writ petition, i.e ,W.PC No.3975/2025 by questioning the order dated 28.07.2025 mainly on the ground that the said order has been passed without hearing him, therefore, the same deserves to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submitted that the applicant has no locus even to question the order as passed by this Court on 28.07.2025, therefore, this review petition deserves to be dismissed. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the original writ petition including the order dated 28.07.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.3975/2025. 3 5. Perusal of original writ petition including order dated 28.07.2025 would reveal that thought the applicant/Ekta Swa Sahayata Samuh was impleaded as respondent No.6 in the writ petition, but neither it was noticed nor opportunity of hearing was given to him. 6. Since the order impugned dated 28.07.2025 has been passed without hearing the petitioner, who was one of the respondent in the original writ petition, therefore, the review petition deserves to be allowed. 7. Accordingly, the review petition is allowed and writ petition is restored to its original number and list it today itself. Parties are directed to appear in the said writ petition, i.e., W.P.(C) No.3975/2025. Registry is directed to mention the names of all parties and their respective counsels in the cause list while listing the case. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-