Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38787 (CHH)

KRISHNA KUMAR DESHMUKH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9217/2025 · 2025-08-11

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9217 of 2025 1 - Krishna Kumar Deshmukh S/o Khorbahara Ram Aged About 38 Years Working As Teacher At Government Pre-Secondary School, Jewara, Shirsa Development Block And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education, Durg Division, District Durg (C.G.) 4 - Collector District Durg (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Cum Secretary District Rationalization Committee Durg, District Durg, (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Shailesh Puri on behalf of Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 12.08. 202 5 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 07.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred under the Teachers Rationalization Instructions. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional 2 Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder